The Worst Snack of 2010
December 20, 2010 8 Comments
It was a difficult decision. Snack Girl has made her choice.
The Nabisco 100 calorie snack pack takes it for Worst Snack of 2010!
Why? Oh, so MANY reasons. I will enumerate why I think they deserve this distinction. They:
- Taste terrible.
- Use too much packaging (bad for the environment).
- Have almost zero nutritional value.
- Leave you hungry.
- Trick you into thinking you did something healthy (just 100 calories!).
- Are expensive ($3.00 a box).
What else can I say? These are a crappy choice in a world of much better choices for packaged snacks. See my list here of healthy packaged snacks: Healthy Eating.
Snack Girl features a list of the Worst Snacks. And there were some serious runners-up to the Worst Snack of 2010. Here are some of the other contenders:
560 Calories For Your Rapid Consumption From McDonald's
You Can De-Ice an Aircraft With This New WORST Drink Winner
This Blueberry Muffin Has a Dark Secret
The worst snack in America?
Which Favorite Snack has 35 Ingredients?
I am SURE they are really bummed that they didn't win :)
Please share your nominees for the worst snack of 2010.
Want to read about snacks?
Don't Forget This Classic
Are Whole Wheat Ritz Crackers Healthy?
Heavenly Fresh Ginger Cake From David Lebovitz
Leaving Santa Cookies? Try This Instead!